<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McHugh Favors $10 Gas Tax? :Eek!:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jackmchughblog.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/mchugh-favors-10-gas-tax-eek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jackmchughblog.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/mchugh-favors-10-gas-tax-eek/</link>
	<description>Comments on politics, policy, culture, history, Michigan and more - not-boring, not-trite.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax NOT “Just a Higher Gas Tax” &#171; Jack McHugh&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://jackmchughblog.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/mchugh-favors-10-gas-tax-eek/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Revenue-Neutral Carbon Tax NOT “Just a Higher Gas Tax” &#171; Jack McHugh&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jackmchughblog.wordpress.com/?p=19#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] Gillman responded to the revenue-neutral carbon tax proposal I’ve described by saying that transportation taxes (gas tax) should only be used by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gillman responded to the revenue-neutral carbon tax proposal I’ve described by saying that transportation taxes (gas tax) should only be used by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
